Law #1: No major
computer project is ever installed on time, within budget, with the same
staff that started it, nor does the project do what it is supposed to
do.
Corollary 1: The benefits will
be smaller than initially estimated, if estimates were made at all.
Corollary 2: The system finally
installed will be installed late and won't do what it is supposed to
do.
Corollary 3: It will cost more
but it will be technically successful..
Law #2: One advantage of fuzzy
project objectives is that they let you avoid embarrassment in
estimating the corresponding costs. . . .
Law #3: The effort required to
correct your course of action increases geometrically with time. . . .
Law #4: Purposes as understood by
the proposer will be seen differently by everyone else. . . .
Law #5: Only measurable benefits
are real. Intangible benefits are not measurable. Therefore intangible
benefits are not real. . . .
Law #6: Anyone who can work
effectively on a project part-time certainly doesn't have enough to do
now. . . .
Law #7: The greater the Project's
technical complexity, the less you need a technician to manage it. . . .
Law #8: A carelessly planned
project will take three times longer to complete than expected. A
carefully planned project will only take twice as long. . . .
Law #9: If anything can go wrong,
it will. . . .
Law #10: When things are going
well, something will go wrong. . . .
Law #11: Project teams detest
weekly progress reporting because it so vividly manifests their lack of
progress. . . .
Law #12: Projects progress
quickly until they are 90 percent complete, and then they remain 90
percent complete forever. . . .
Law #13: If project scope is
allowed to change freely, the rate of change will exceed the rate of
progress. . . .
Law #14: If the user does not
believe in the system, he will develop a parallel system...neither
system will work very well. . . .
Law #15: Benefits achieved are a
function of the thoroughness of the post-audit check. . . .